AhlulBayt News Agency: According to Kashmir Media Service, the document traces the latest crisis from the 22 April killings in Pahalgam, Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir, to the cease fire brokered on 10 May. It singles out India’s overnight air and missile strikes of 6–7 May as the decisive trigger for a rapid escalation that saw both sides exchange heavy fire until international mediators intervened.
According to the briefing, New Delhi blamed Islamabad for the Pahalgam incident without presenting evidence and launched cross border attacks that hit civilian areas and Pakistani military sites in both Pakistan and Azad Kashmir.
Islamabad, which denied involvement and called for an independent inquiry, responded with retaliatory strikes and vowed to meet any future aggression “in kind.”
The confrontation widened as India suspended bilateral trade, sealed land borders and threatened to revoke the Indus Waters Treaty. Pakistan responded with reciprocal measures and hinted at shelving the 1971 Shimla Agreement.
Parliamentary researchers conclude that Pakistan “showed restraint within the bounds of international law,” while India relied on “force, threats and accusations,” exacerbating regional instability. The report criticizes India for ignoring United Nations resolutions on Kashmir and rejecting mediation offers from the United States, the United Kingdom and other powers.
Analysts quoted in the study argue that invoking the Pahalgam attack fits a historical pattern in which India, seeking to entrench its control of Kashmir, frames the conflict as counter terrorism while resisting outside involvement.
The report also faults Washington and London for an initially “sluggish” response, noting that U.S. back channel diplomacy eventually helped secure the 10 May truce but did not persuade India to accept an external role in future talks.
With both nations armed with nuclear weapons, the study urges the international community to take “robust, proactive measures” to deter further hostilities, cautioning that any repeat of the May confrontation could have catastrophic consequences.
Your Comment